FGCOM/libpri
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

DMS-100 not receiving caller name anymore.

Browse Source 
Looks like DMS-100 is using the same message as Q.SIG to receive the
caller name.

Add the ability to decode the ROSE calling name message defined for the
Q.SIG switch on the DMS-100 switch.

(closes issue #18822)
Reported by: cmorford
Patches:
      issue18822_v1.4.patch uploaded by rmudgett (license 664)
Tested by: cmorford


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4@2206 2fbb986a-6c06-0410-b554-c9c1f0a7f128
This commit is contained in:
Richard Mudgett
2011-02-17 20:35:01 +00:00
parent 492a19ab7d
commit df22f0e1cb
1 changed files with 28 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
rose.c
View File

@@ -1237,6 +1237,34 @@ static const struct rose_convert_msg rose_dms100_msgs[] = {
rose_enc_dms100_RLT_ThirdParty_ARG, NULL,
rose_dec_dms100_RLT_ThirdParty_ARG, NULL
},
/* DMS-100 seems to have pirated some Q.SIG messages */
/*
* localValue's from Q.SIG Name-Operations
* { iso(1) standard(0) pss1-name(13868) name-operations(0) }
*/
{
ROSE_QSIG_CallingName, NULL, 0,
rose_enc_qsig_CallingName_ARG, NULL,
rose_dec_qsig_CallingName_ARG, NULL
},
#if 0 /* ROSE_DMS100_RLT_OPERATION_IND, and ROSE_DMS100_RLT_THIRD_PARTY conflict! */
{
ROSE_QSIG_CalledName, NULL, 1,
rose_enc_qsig_CalledName_ARG, NULL,
rose_dec_qsig_CalledName_ARG, NULL
},
{
ROSE_QSIG_ConnectedName, NULL, 2,
rose_enc_qsig_ConnectedName_ARG, NULL,
rose_dec_qsig_ConnectedName_ARG, NULL
},
{
ROSE_QSIG_BusyName, NULL, 3,
rose_enc_qsig_BusyName_ARG, NULL,
rose_dec_qsig_BusyName_ARG, NULL
},
#endif
/* *INDENT-ON* */
};