Removed these old files that do little in the context of the current
OpenSceneGraph disitribution apart from clogs things up!
This commit is contained in:
2207
ChangeLog.preCVS
2207
ChangeLog.preCVS
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
340
FAQ
340
FAQ
@@ -1,340 +0,0 @@
|
||||
o API's feature set
|
||||
|
||||
- scene graph based?
|
||||
|
||||
The scene graph is arranged with geometry nodes (osg::Geode's) as leaf
|
||||
nodes and internal nodes such as osg::DCS's/Groups/LOD etc for position the
|
||||
geometry objects within the scene and organizing scene behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
- culling techniques?
|
||||
|
||||
Currently view frustum culling, small feature culling, and OpenGL's
|
||||
native backface culling. The OSG has been designed so it can be
|
||||
easily extended, so if you have a favored culling technique it
|
||||
won't be difficult to utilize it in the OSG.
|
||||
|
||||
- terrain / indoor support
|
||||
|
||||
The osg::GeoSet encapsulates all the main OpenGL drawing primitive
|
||||
so its possible to represent pretty well anything you can with straight
|
||||
OpenGL including terrain and room objects and characters. More
|
||||
details below.
|
||||
|
||||
However, if you wish to take advantage of specific optimization such
|
||||
as adaptive meshing such as ROAM, or procedural culling such as when
|
||||
entering a room or when racing round a track then the OSG's could be
|
||||
easily extend to achieve this. This is demonstrated in VTP Enviro
|
||||
which is is based on the OSG, extended osg::GeoSet to provide CLOD
|
||||
for terrain.
|
||||
|
||||
These features are not currently on the todo list for version 1.0 as
|
||||
we intend to keep the OSG focused on the core scene graph. However,
|
||||
you're more than welcome to take on the challenge yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
- etc, etc (the viz sim capabilities of it)
|
||||
|
||||
Key features of OpenGL are encapsulated such as Points, Lines, Triangle
|
||||
and Quad Meshed primitives in osg::GeoSet, and Textures, Projected &
|
||||
Environmental Textures, Transparency etc. in osg::GeoState.
|
||||
|
||||
The osgUtil::RenderVisitor currently implements the cull/draw traversal
|
||||
placing objects to be rendered in either a transparency bin or a
|
||||
opaque bin. The transparent bin is depth sorting w.r.t to the eye point
|
||||
to ensure transparent objects appear correctly. The opaque bin
|
||||
is sorted w.r.t to their osg::GeoState to minimize OpenGL state changes
|
||||
to avoid cache misses in the rendering pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
osg::Billboards can be used for rendering trees, or even particle
|
||||
effects such a smoke, snow, explosions etc.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o What is the design philosophy behind the OSG.
|
||||
|
||||
(An extract from an email from Don Burns beginnings of the OSG.)
|
||||
|
||||
Thought I'd jot a couple of thoughts down regarding OSG. A full
|
||||
simulation package should really be made up of four parts:
|
||||
|
||||
- Scene Graph
|
||||
- Traversers (App, Cull, Draw)
|
||||
- An MP harness
|
||||
- Channel configuration
|
||||
|
||||
The Scene Graph is just that. It manages a tree structure of different
|
||||
node types that allow management over the behavior of graphical
|
||||
objects. The Traversers allow us to use the scene graph to render
|
||||
scenes in the most efficient manner, as well as providing maximum
|
||||
functionality for a real-time simulation. The stages are (taken from
|
||||
the Performer approach) :
|
||||
|
||||
App - This is the application part of the simulation that interfaces
|
||||
with the outside world, that is control devices, pilot input, animation
|
||||
engines, effects, event engines, etc, etc (there's much more). This is
|
||||
also the stage that determines what the viewpoint is and consequently
|
||||
the viewing frustum. App does a full traversal of the scene graph,
|
||||
calling callbacks that may be attached to nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
Cull - This stage takes the information that has been updated by App
|
||||
(mainly the viewing frustum) and effects a cull of all objects, based on
|
||||
trivial accept or reject based on whether the bounds are contained in
|
||||
the viewing frustum or not. Every node should have a bound associated
|
||||
with it reflecting the bounds of all children under it. This way, Cull
|
||||
can quickly prune a large section of the scene graph, during traversal.
|
||||
It also implies that scene graphs should be organized spatially, such
|
||||
that groups of objects that are close to each other should also be close
|
||||
to each other on the scene graph. During traversal, Cull gathers all
|
||||
leaf nodes that wind up being trivially accepted and creates a display
|
||||
list of geosets with their geostates. These are then sorted by
|
||||
geostate, binning things like states that contain transparencies, and
|
||||
need to be sorted back to front and drawn last. Cull can also perform
|
||||
accepts/rejects of geosets based on their bounding boxes. Note that
|
||||
geosets have bounding boxes and geodes have bounding spheres. This for
|
||||
efficiency.
|
||||
|
||||
Cull also needs to gather nodes that would cause any glcommands, such as
|
||||
SCSs and DCSs which create transforms.
|
||||
|
||||
Draw- This does not traverse the scene graph, but rather, traverses the
|
||||
resultant display list produced by Cull. Draw is to be as brain-dead as
|
||||
possible since it has the bulk of compute time reserved for actually
|
||||
drawing. (Unless, of course you have the luxury of an SGI machine that
|
||||
does all transforms down in the graphics hardware... perhaps NV10 will
|
||||
help a bit on this end).
|
||||
|
||||
The MP harness is a set of management routines for doing
|
||||
multiprocessing. Ideally, you want to be able to run App, Cull and Draw
|
||||
as separate processes on their own dedicated processors. Further, you
|
||||
want to run one complete Draw process for every graphics subsystem that
|
||||
you will be rendering to. In our case, we can assume that most of our
|
||||
users will be on single processor PC's, in which case we stand to
|
||||
benefit from Cull's capability to prune the scene graph, but not much
|
||||
else. However, this day and age four processor PC's are not that
|
||||
uncommon, and Linux does have pretty good support for this.
|
||||
|
||||
The MP issues include, process (or thread) management and
|
||||
synchronization. Performer has several MP models. We also need to
|
||||
consider that this software will probably run on separate PCs
|
||||
altogether, so that the SGI concept of a single machine with multiple
|
||||
rendering pipes needs to be extended to include multiple PC's, which
|
||||
need to be synchronized across Ethernet or something.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that each Draw process needs its own Cull process, but that there
|
||||
can be only one App for multiple Cull/Draw pairs. This model might
|
||||
extend quite nicely to a multiple PC environment, in which each PC runs
|
||||
a Cull/Draw pair, and one central machine runs App, broadcasting the
|
||||
viewing frustum for each viewing channel and synchronizing all.
|
||||
|
||||
Lastly, channel configuration. Currently we now do this by opening a
|
||||
window, choosing a visual, size, etc. It is often desirable to have
|
||||
multiple channels (or viewports) for one simulator. There is a whole
|
||||
package of routines that can be written to set this up and initialize
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
That all being said, as I write this my feeling is that we should limit
|
||||
the scope of OSG to that of only the first item above. That is, Open
|
||||
Scene Graph will be a Scene Graph and nothing more. Limiting the scope
|
||||
will allow us to concentrate on quality and robust functionality. This
|
||||
is one of the best software steps that was taken during the design of
|
||||
OpenGL, in my opinion. I recall Iris GL and all of its end-all, be-all
|
||||
approach, becoming very convoluted and confusing as it tried to be a
|
||||
windowing system, an input device interface, an imaging package and so
|
||||
forth. Once the spec defined it as being a rendering API and nothing
|
||||
more, the picture got much clearer.
|
||||
|
||||
Once OSG is in place and it becomes useful, we can then write the
|
||||
traversers, etc, but not limit our version of traversers. My thinking
|
||||
is that we can publish examples and documents on How to Write an
|
||||
OSG Traverser, or some such and sit back and watch the world develop
|
||||
the best. This will also leave us flexible to use the OSG as a protocol
|
||||
for doing 3D on the web, or whatever. We can write the viewers,
|
||||
traversers, MP harnesses, and channel config software as separate
|
||||
packages.
|
||||
|
||||
Further, I think this will help in the acceptability of OSG as a good
|
||||
standard scene graph. One of Performer's biggest weaknesses is that it
|
||||
is a huge API and the learning curve is so steep that many but the most
|
||||
hearty are put off by it. We can make the Scene Graph that anyone can
|
||||
use.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Would the OSG be a good candidate for terrain visualization.
|
||||
|
||||
Terrain is one of the great candidates for scene graphs. Two management
|
||||
schemes will help you out : Level Of Detail management and Visibility
|
||||
Culling.
|
||||
|
||||
LOD management consists of defining your visual database (including your
|
||||
terrain) with differing levels of detail. The further away you are the
|
||||
less detail your terrain needs to have and you can cut down on the amount
|
||||
of polygons required to render it.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also do this with objects in your scene. For example from 10
|
||||
meters, you'd like a barn to have all the details present, but from 1000
|
||||
meters, you could probably get away with the lack of the silo, windows and
|
||||
detail around the doors. From 10000 meters it could just as easily be a
|
||||
square red box and at 15000 meters it might as well not be there since
|
||||
its representation may be less than a pixel on the screen.
|
||||
|
||||
Visibility Culling is also important to high performance rendering,
|
||||
especially if your visual database is large. All nodes on the scene graph
|
||||
have a bounding sphere. Each parent node has a bounding sphere that
|
||||
encompasses all of its children. The Cull process traverses the scene
|
||||
graph and tests each node for whether any part of it is in the current
|
||||
viewing frustum. If not it throws it away.
|
||||
|
||||
With this in mind, you can arrange your database to make best use of
|
||||
culling. For example, if you have a lot of trees on your terrain. Rather
|
||||
than having one Group node that contains all trees (in which case Cull
|
||||
would have to test every tree for visibility), you arrange your trees in
|
||||
a hierarchical fashion, such that trees are group by geographical
|
||||
location. Then neighboring groups of trees can be parented together,
|
||||
groups of groups can be parented together and so forth. This way Cull can
|
||||
visit a high level node, determine that none of the trees under it are
|
||||
visible and proceed to test the rest of the scene graph.
|
||||
|
||||
This also works for terrain. Rather than defining one large piece of
|
||||
terrain, you should break it up into smaller sections. This way, what is
|
||||
not in the viewing frustum can be discarded and the rendering pipeline
|
||||
left unbothered by transforming and clipping polygons that would never
|
||||
appear anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
One of the goals of OSG is to be, again, "Just a scene graph". Which
|
||||
means that the Cull traversal would not be included as part of the
|
||||
software. It would be up to the user to provide that, OR, we can add it
|
||||
as a separate piece outside of the scene graph. We want users to not be
|
||||
limited to what WE think might be the best cull traversal, but rather
|
||||
leave it as an exercise to optimize, be creative and/or create specific
|
||||
cull/draw traversals that best suit your needs.
|
||||
|
||||
One such traversal I can think of is a game in which you are on a track.
|
||||
At any point on this track you can know exactly what is in view and what
|
||||
is not. You could do something much more creative with this if you are
|
||||
not limited to the implementation "hard coded" in the scene graph
|
||||
software.
|
||||
|
||||
o What are the intended target platforms?
|
||||
|
||||
Any platform which supports OpenGL and Standard C++!
|
||||
|
||||
The real limit being the platforms available to the core developers,
|
||||
if you have a platform which you need supported and have some time
|
||||
to contribute please contact us.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o What platforms are currently supported?
|
||||
|
||||
The OSG is currently developed under Windows95/98/NT/2000/XP, Linux,Irix, FreeBSD Mac OSX
|
||||
and Solaris. Platform specific makedefs are provided for Unix, and VisualC++ 6.0
|
||||
Workspace files for MS Windows platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o I'm wondering when the OSG will be ready for release.
|
||||
|
||||
An alpha version has been available since May 2000. The current
|
||||
version is very much a work in progress will the API still in flux.
|
||||
|
||||
Once the design converges to a stable API we will issue it as a beta,
|
||||
depending on the various factors one would hope to have the API nailed
|
||||
down during early-mid 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
A full release with stable API and implementation will be available in
|
||||
later half of the summer 2002.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o What are the dependencies of the OSG?
|
||||
|
||||
Kept to a minimum by design. The osg scene graph library simply requires OpenGL/Mesa
|
||||
and compiler support for Standard C++. This means that there is not platform specific
|
||||
depedancies, and should allow the OSG to be ported easily to new platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
The scene graph viewer sgv depends upon the osg library and GLUT, so should be portable
|
||||
to any platform which GLUT can be ported to. The viewer can also be compiled with FLTK
|
||||
using its GLUT compatibility code.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Do you think Open Scene Graph could be a nice replacement for Inventor?
|
||||
|
||||
Depends what your want from your scene graph. If you primary interest
|
||||
is a visual simulation application then the performance emphasis of the
|
||||
OSG will be appropriate, if you want to develop a modeling
|
||||
application and wish to take advantage out of the box UI tools then
|
||||
Inventor may be better.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o What differentiation between the OSG and other OS projects such as OpenRM/
|
||||
SGL/OpenSG/DDG Toolkit?
|
||||
|
||||
I have briefly looked both the SGL, DDG and the OpenSG. Both the SGL
|
||||
are the OpenSG show some uncanny similarities with the OSG, especially
|
||||
since they all were developed independently. The influence of sgi's Performer,
|
||||
Inventor and Cosmo3D more than likely providing the starting place for designing
|
||||
each of these scene graphs. DDG doesn't show quite the same heritage,
|
||||
and possibly loses a little cleanness of design with it. OpenRM is
|
||||
an attempt at a Object Orientated scene graph but it C... This is
|
||||
about a close as I got with it, as IMHO C++ really is currently the best
|
||||
language for a modern scene graph
|
||||
|
||||
The OSG is also strongly influenced by Performer, this a due to the
|
||||
application which the OSG was first developed for : a Hang Gliding
|
||||
Flight simulator which can use either Performer or the OSG for its
|
||||
scene graph. The OSG does not try to implement the whole of Performer
|
||||
though, just concentrating of the scene graph to keep the scope in
|
||||
manageable proportions. The need for the OSG comes about because
|
||||
Performer is only available on Irix with Linux only happening very
|
||||
recently, and Performer is closed source of course.
|
||||
|
||||
The OSG also takes advantage of the features of Standard C++ and Design
|
||||
Patterns to help make the library cleaner and improve its extensibility.
|
||||
|
||||
Many of the current scene graphs, including Inventor and its clones, don't
|
||||
use STL so end up having define their own container and many common
|
||||
algorithms. We're glad to say that Standard C++ compilers are now
|
||||
common enough that we don't have to descend the lowest common denominator
|
||||
like many older scene graphs.
|
||||
|
||||
The OpenSG design document looks like it describes a very powerful
|
||||
scene graph design, taking on almost all what Performer tackles today.
|
||||
However, this will mean that it will be big, and like the Inventor clones
|
||||
will take *alot* of work to fully implement. If you need all the features
|
||||
then the OpenSG may well be worth the wait. If you need less features then
|
||||
the more humble goals of the OSG may well be right for you.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Is there a class diagram for the OSG, or white paper on the projects goals?
|
||||
|
||||
The documentation in the distribution has been generated automatically
|
||||
using the excellent Open Source tool doc++, which creates class diagrams.
|
||||
UML diagrams have been generated and can be found in the documentation
|
||||
directory, along with mind maps on design patterns used in the osg,
|
||||
and the mission/goals of the osg.
|
||||
|
||||
We haven't written an official white paper on projects goals or a design
|
||||
overview yet. Knowledge of Performer will help in understanding some of the basics
|
||||
of design, as will a familiarity with Design Patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Do you need C++ coding support?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, indeed! Check out the TODO list which comes with the distribution,
|
||||
and email us with what you fancy contributing to.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Any recommendations for useful programming books to read to help understand
|
||||
and contribute to the OSG?
|
||||
|
||||
Good practices are surprisingly hard to come by. C and C++ give you so
|
||||
much rope to hang yourself, but there's few books which really give a
|
||||
developers the rule book of good coding practices. I found Effective
|
||||
C++ a refreshing contribution to this end. The Design Patterns book can
|
||||
be pretty useful as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Is there a mailing list?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes indeed, hosted by source forge, so to subscribe head to :
|
||||
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openscenegraph and follow the
|
||||
'Lists' link and follow the instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
o How do I submit my contributions?
|
||||
|
||||
Up till then send your changes, to <robert@openscenegraph.com>
|
||||
169
TODO
169
TODO
@@ -1,169 +0,0 @@
|
||||
OSG TODO List
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
Main categories
|
||||
===============
|
||||
|
||||
o Core OSG Library
|
||||
- the core OSG library itself (include/OSG and src/)
|
||||
o Reader/writer plug-ins
|
||||
- the reader/writers plug-ins for third party file formats.
|
||||
o Viewers & Application plug-ins
|
||||
- osg viewers and plug-ins to third party applications such as Netscape.
|
||||
o Under development
|
||||
- listing of TODO items which are currently under developement.
|
||||
o Work completed
|
||||
- listing of TODO items which have been done and hence removed
|
||||
from the above TODO catagories.
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
o Core OSG Library
|
||||
================
|
||||
- General
|
||||
. Header & code documentation/reference guide.
|
||||
. Programming guide.
|
||||
. Naming conventions.
|
||||
. mutli-threading/shared memory support.
|
||||
|
||||
- Maths
|
||||
. double matrix class.
|
||||
|
||||
- Nodes
|
||||
. add osg::Sequence for basic animation.
|
||||
. add osg::Morph for interpolating between geometries.
|
||||
. add osg::Engine.
|
||||
. add support for Multi-texturing into osg::GeoSet/osg::GeoState.
|
||||
. add support for pixel/vertex shaders into osg::GeoSet/osg::GeoState.
|
||||
. utilise stl vectors for osg::GeoSets?
|
||||
. add osg::Terrain node.
|
||||
. add proxy node for lazy loading of nodes, when needed.
|
||||
. implement visual proximity to assist loading of proxied data
|
||||
when the view frustum nears an unloaded proxy node, and deleting
|
||||
of unused proxied data.
|
||||
. implement support for modified status/lazy evaluation of node data
|
||||
and observer style pattern.
|
||||
. manipulator decoration nodes?
|
||||
. spacial subdivision decoration nodes?
|
||||
. improved osgUtil:TriStripVisitor to replace NvTriStrip code.
|
||||
. update of osgText to latest FTGL.
|
||||
. create osg::Drawable::PrimtiveFunrctor
|
||||
. support for volume rendering.
|
||||
. occlusion culling.
|
||||
. integrated osgEnv.
|
||||
. implement a osg::CameraRelativeNode for earth sky/HUD's etc.
|
||||
. thread safety.
|
||||
. osgMultipipe.
|
||||
. multi-textureing -> multi-pass support for platforms which do not
|
||||
support multi-texturing.
|
||||
. improve tri-intersection code.
|
||||
. osgParticles - support for particle effects.
|
||||
. osgAnimation - support for skinning etc.
|
||||
. osgShader - suppor for shader languages.
|
||||
. improved impostor implementation - use depth textures?
|
||||
. clean up multi-bin control.
|
||||
. osgUtil::MultiSceneView/Multi-channel configuration.
|
||||
. support for node kits via the plugins mechanism.
|
||||
. Added ImageGroup's which can be attached to textures for animation.
|
||||
|
||||
- Visitors
|
||||
. improve state sorting of opaque bins in osg::RenderBin.
|
||||
. add statistics visitor for logging the stats of the scene graph.
|
||||
. add OpenGL picking visitor.
|
||||
|
||||
- IO/Plug-in support
|
||||
. improve the ascii parsing class osg::Field, osg::FieldReader etc.
|
||||
. add support for file path logging into osg::Input.
|
||||
. add binary data reading and writing into osg::Input/osg::Output to
|
||||
support part binary .osg files.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Reader/writer plug-ins
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
- .iv/.wrl Inventor/VRML ascii.
|
||||
- .dxf Autocads ascii format.
|
||||
- .dem digital elevation map.
|
||||
- .d3d? MS's Direct 3D file formats if they have one..
|
||||
- 3D Studio plugin to export to .osg.
|
||||
- Miya plugin to export to .osg.
|
||||
|
||||
o Viewers & Application plug-ins
|
||||
===============================
|
||||
- OSG scene graph viewer - sgv.
|
||||
. add command line reading for specifying data search paths and data,
|
||||
-D for data search path, -d for data.
|
||||
. add command line reading for specifying library search paths and
|
||||
libraries/plug-ins, -D for library search path, -l for libraries.
|
||||
- Internet Explorer plug-in.
|
||||
- .osg to Inventor file plug-in.
|
||||
- Tutorials example programs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o Under development
|
||||
=================
|
||||
Sign up here if would like to take on a task :-)
|
||||
|
||||
- add osg::Billboard for trees etc.
|
||||
- Netscape plug-in.
|
||||
- Mac port.
|
||||
- tri stripping visitor.
|
||||
- .obj Alias wavefront's format.(functioning already.)
|
||||
- .lwo Light Waves's format.(functioning already.)
|
||||
- .pfb loader for Performer binary files (functioning already.)
|
||||
- .flt Open Flight format (functioning already.)
|
||||
- .3ds 3D Studio format (functioning already.)
|
||||
|
||||
o Work completed
|
||||
==============
|
||||
- osg namespace implemented.
|
||||
- reduce the STL platform specific #ifdef's.
|
||||
- remove using namespace from all header files, so not to pollute user space.
|
||||
- remove the sg prefix from sgNode etc, now that the osg namespaces exits.
|
||||
- FAQ for distribution and web site.
|
||||
- full maths support in osg::Vec2, osg::Vec3 and osg::Vec4.
|
||||
- change the osg::Registry to use plug-in RW's on loading a plug-in
|
||||
instead of the plug-in functions found in sg.cxx.
|
||||
- add support for removal of plug-ins from osg::Registry,
|
||||
- add .osg support into DCS node.
|
||||
- clean up inheritance relationship between osg::Node, osg::Object etc.
|
||||
- add osg::Switch for handling optional rendering of children.
|
||||
- add osg::LOD (level of detail) group node for load management.
|
||||
- add view frustrum culling into osg::RenderVisitor.
|
||||
- add support for mutliply referenced nodes into osg::Input.
|
||||
- add a quaternion class.
|
||||
- improve osg::BoundingBox and osg::BoundingSphere.
|
||||
- add hit and intersect classes for collision detection.
|
||||
- add intersect visitor.
|
||||
- add camera manipualotors for trackball, drive and flight mouse control.
|
||||
- add compile OpenGL display lists visitor (currently in sgv).
|
||||
- library version and description functions.
|
||||
- add support for OpenGL Vertex Array into osg::GeoSet.
|
||||
- .gif GIF Images!
|
||||
- .jpg JPEG Images.
|
||||
- .tiff TIFF Images.
|
||||
- .png PNG Images.
|
||||
- .tga TGA Images.
|
||||
- .pic PIC Images.
|
||||
- add timing/timestamp class.
|
||||
- document how to get the OSG compiled and running under all
|
||||
platforms, Win32 being priority as it's the least obvious.
|
||||
- .gz (as osgtgz and .tgz) Automatic unzipping of GNU zipped files.
|
||||
- .zip Automatic unzipping of windows zipped files.
|
||||
- add osg::State for mainting image of the OpenGL state.
|
||||
- improve osg::GeoState -> improved version call osg::StateSet.
|
||||
- create a base class to provide interface to objects which can render,
|
||||
derive osg::GeoSet from this.
|
||||
- add support for multi-pass rendering.
|
||||
- full maths support in osg::Matrix class.
|
||||
- osg::Plane class.
|
||||
- add osg::Camera class.
|
||||
- add osg::EarthSky class for rendering earth and sky backgrounds.
|
||||
- return error messages of on failed loading/saving.
|
||||
- .bmp Windows Bitmap files.
|
||||
- .tar Automatic unpacking of directories and loading of contents.
|
||||
- add handling of memory of osg::GeoSet's attributes.
|
||||
- Added tracking of matrix stacks in osg::State.
|
||||
- improved stereo support.
|
||||
- improved makefiles.
|
||||
- improve the node callback mechanism.
|
||||
- CVS support for when source is made fully public.
|
||||
- full maths support in osg::Matrix class.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user