* Avoid reactivity bugs in how we track external state
Many of our hooks which attempt to bridge external state from an EventEmitter or EventTarget into React had subtle bugs which could cause them to fail to react to certain updates. The conditions necessary for triggering these bugs are explained by the tests that I've included.
In the majority of cases, I don't think we were triggering these bugs in practice. They could've become problems if we refactored our components in certain ways. The one concrete case I'm aware of in which we actually triggered such a bug was the race condition with the useRoomEncryptionSystem shared secret logic (addressed by a1110af6d5).
But, particularly with all the weird reactivity issues we're debugging this week, I think we need to eliminate the possibility that any of the bugs in these hooks are the cause of our current headaches.
* Reuse useTypedEventEmitterState in useLocalStorage
* Fix type error
We forgot to tell React that we need the audio renderer to react to changes in the set of MatrixRTC participants; instead we had it referencing rtcSession.memberships non-reactively.
Now, I'm not 100% confident that this is going to fix the "speaking from the void" issues observed in the wild, because I can't reproduce them and, in my testing, the InCallView component always seemed to be rendered redundantly when the MatrixRTC participants change, even though we hadn't explicitly stated that it needs to react. (This makes sense as we haven't memoized the component.) But it's worth a shot.
This gives us the additional insurance of breaking the Safari media acquisition loop at the source by admitting that they can be spurious in practice. Safari, why!?
Because we're now requiring the 'Prevent blocked' check to pass before merging a PR, GitHub Actions now expects it to be associated with the latest Git ref of the PR's branch whenever the branch is updated. Therefore we need to re-run the workflow on the 'synchronize' event.
Because the latest version requires eslint-plugin-unicorn v57, which requires eslint v9, and eslint-plugin-matrix-org is not yet compatible with eslint v9.
Now that the toger5/add-room-key-fallback-on-encryption-manager-not-supported branch has been merged, we can reset to develop. (And need to, actually, because that branch is deleted.)
It doesn't check whether it's actually used inside a GroupCallErrorBoundary, and it's generally useful for interacting with any error boundary, so I'm giving it a generic name to reflect this.
We were previously using the useGroupCallErrorBoundary hook to surface errors that happened during joining, but because that part is outside the GroupCallErrorBoundary it just ended up sending them to the app-level error boundary where they got displayed with a more generic message.
Whenever we use a Git dependency, we should reference a specific tag or commit rather than a branch name, because Yarn Classic is bad at recognizing when a Git dependency needs to be re-installed due to it resolving to a new version. (It seems to simply use the version from package.json as a cache key.)
This is relevant only for developers who run 'yarn install' on top of a previously up-to-date working copy, not for CI which re-installs the project on every run.
Following a75952cf77, this is one more upgrade to the widget communication that I'd like to make within this release cycle.
The motivating issue is https://github.com/element-hq/element-web/issues/29429. Fundamentally, without a 'join' action, the only info Element Web can use to determine whether it's joined the call is whether a MatrixRTC membership exists. But membership state events can inaccurately represent the client's actual state (whether because delayed events aren't supported, or because the delayed event hasn't timed out yet), so I suggest we send a 'join' action here just as we do in the Element Web Jitsi wrapper (https://github.com/element-hq/element-web/blob/e9a3625bd6e9a64f216e3caeabca66f48b649332/src/vector/jitsi/index.ts#L503) to let Element Web tap directly into the widget's local state. (This will need additional Element Web changes, but is certainly backwards compatible.)